My quick rating - 6.9/10. I finally got around to watching this one on New Year’s Eve (12/31/23) — happy new year, everyone! It was an interesting pick for the occasion, though I could’ve done without the opening scene of a massive car crash, given the circumstances. That said, the film is an engaging and suspenseful thriller that easily surpasses the original Cloverfield in the story department although they are totally different types of movies. One reason for this improvement lies in the film’s origins. 10 Cloverfield Lane began as a standalone script (The Cellar) and was later adapted into the Cloverfield universe. While the connection feels a bit forced, particularly in the rushed and tacked-on ending, it doesn’t significantly detract from the overall quality. The movie remains a well-crafted psychological thriller with a sharp focus on character-driven tension. Set primarily in a confined, claustrophobic bunker, the film thrives on its small, core cast and their evolving dynamics. Mary Elizabeth Winstead shines as the protagonist, pulling us into her perspective as the story unfolds with subtle twists and turns. John Goodman is a standout as Howard, delivering an unsettling performance that blurs the line between paranoia and reason. His portrayal ensures that we’re constantly questioning his motives and the truth of the situation. The film wisely prioritizes story over special effects, building suspense through character interactions and the ever-present tension of the unknown. Its ability to keep you on edge is a testament to strong writing and direction (Dan Trachtenberg). However, one drawback is an unresolved plot point (or maybe I missed it) that left me scratching my head. In summary, 10 Cloverfield Lane is an intriguing and tightly executed thriller that keeps you guessing until the end. While its connection to the Cloverfield universe might feel a little forced, the film’s compelling mystery and excellent performances make it well worth a watch.
留言