24 Hours to Live (2017)
- Justin Whippo
- 3 hours ago
- 2 min read
My quick rating - 6.3/10. 24 Hours to Live takes a concept that could have easily been dismissed as a throwaway gimmick and turns it into a surprisingly engaging action thriller. The film stars Ethan Hawke as Travis Conrad, a professional assassin who finds himself in a very unusual predicament. While on a contract job, he crosses paths with Lin (Xu Qing), an Interpol agent, and winds up on the wrong side of her trigger. Normally, that would be the end of the story—but thanks to a classified experimental procedure, Conrad is literally brought back from the dead. The catch? He’s only got 24 hours before the clock runs out again.
What could have been a silly setup actually works better than expected. Knowing he’s on borrowed time, Conrad makes the choice to turn against the people who resurrected him and instead joins Lin in protecting the informant he was originally hired to eliminate. The “race against the clock” angle adds some genuine tension, and while the script doesn’t try to reinvent the genre, it delivers a straightforward trip that leans on character chemistry and solid pacing rather than convoluted twists.
Hawke, who isn’t exactly known for being an action star, slips comfortably into the role. He brings just enough strength and humanity to Conrad that you can root for him, even as a career killer searching for redemption. His performance is helped by the fact that the movie wisely reveals bits of his past piece by piece, letting the audience connect with him without the story over-explaining. Xu Qing holds her own as Lin, and their dynamic feels earned rather than forced. Rutger Hauer also shows up as Conrad’s father-in-law Frank, though disappointingly, he’s given very little screen time—a missed opportunity considering Hauer’s presence alone adds weight to any film.
The action is where 24 Hours to Live shines. The filmmakers steer clear of drowning the movie in CGI, opting for practical stunt work, car chases, and grounded fight choreography. Yes, the gunfights occasionally betray their digital blood splatter, but overall, it’s refreshing to see a production that doesn’t lean too heavily on computers. The final twenty minutes, in particular, are a nonstop barrage of bullets and chaos. It’s excessive, sure, but undeniably entertaining.
Of course, I still spotted a few flaws. Some plot holes pop up, especially when it comes to the pseudo-science of bringing someone back to life, but when you’re dealing with a concept this pulpy, that’s to be expected. The important thing is that the film never takes itself too seriously—it knows what it is and leans into being a slick, fast-paced popcorn flick.
In the end, 24 Hours to Live doesn’t break new ground in the action genre, but it doesn’t need to. It gives Ethan Hawke a rare chance to step into action-hero territory and even sprinkles in themes of family and redemption without getting preachy. I have been a fan of his ever since a relatively unknown gem, Mystery Date, way back in 1991. The two films are nothing alike, although they share one thing. Both are just plain fun, and sometimes, that’s enough.
Comments